|
Biomass Charcoal Fuel for Gas
Turbines
ABSTRACT
The U.S. government and industry are developing
technologies to expand the use of biomass (agricultural residues, or crops grown
specifically for energy production) to produce electric power. The U.S. Department of
Energy, Biomass Power Program supports the development of three technologies: direct
combustion, pyrolysis, and gasification. In direct combustion, conventional boilers burn
bulk biomass to generate steam to drive electric generators. Pyrolysis processes produce
oils from biomass that can be burned like petroleum to generate electricity. Biomass
gasification generates a low or medium heating value fuel gas for use in high-efficiency
gas turbine-generators.
The object of the present invention is to convert
biomass to charcoal and use the charcoal in a solid fuel gas turbine combustion system.
Biomass charcoal would be used as feedstock for either a topped or non-topped Pressurized
Fluid Bed Combustion (PFBC) combined cycle process to generate steam and electricity.
Producing charcoal from biomass and using the charcoal as a solid fuel for a gas turbine
is an improved process for the use of biomass for steam and electric power production.
REFERENCES:
U.S PATENT DOCUMENTS:
5,551,958 Antal, Jr. Sept. 3, 1996, Process for charcoal
production from woody and herbaceous plant material.
5,584,970 Schmalfeld, et. al. Dec. 17, 1996, Process of producing wood
charcoal in a moving bed.
5,255,506 Wilkes, et. al. Oct. 26, 1993, Solid fuel combustion system
for gas turbine engine.
OTHER PUBLICATIONS:
Antal, Jr., et al., "High Yield Biomass
Charcoal", Energy & Fuels, Volume 10, Number 3, 652-658 (1996) month unavailable
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The U.S. Department of Energy, Biomass Power Program
supports the development of biomass gasification to produce a fuel gas suitable for
high-efficiency combustion turbine-generators used in the electric power industry.
Gasification of biomass normally occurs in two steps:
pyrolysis to drive off volatile matter and leave behind chars and ash, followed by
gasification of the char to produce a low or medium heating value fuel gas. The gasifier
operating temperatures must be high enough (typically above 850 degrees C) to gasify the
tars produced as pyrolytic byproducts. Gasifiers are pressurized, sometimes to 325 psig
and higher, to increase the biomass processing rates (throughput) and to provide the
desired inlet pressure to the gas turbine. For biomass, these higher pressure operating
conditions complicate the gasifer feeding operations.
Operating conditions for a biomass charcoal reactor are
less severe. Antal discloses that when pyrolysis of biomass is performed in a charcoal
reactor operating at lower temperatures (approximately 350 degrees C.) and pressures
(between 15 to 150 psig), in a stagnant gas environment, the charcoal yield reaches 45% or
more and few tars are produced. Equipment and construction costs, and operation and
maintenance costs, for a charcoal reactor would probably be less than comparable costs for
a high-pressure gasifier with the same biomass throughput capacity.
Pressurized Fluid Bed Combustion (PFBC) was developed in
the U.S. Department of Energy, Clean Coal Technology Program that began in 1986 with a
mandate to improve the efficiency of coal-fired electric power generation systems.
Commercial scale demonstration PFBC systems are capable of achieving efficiencies up to 42
percent. The PFBC burns char from coal to produce steam, and combustion gases for the gas
turbine. The object of the present invention is to transfer this technology to biomass by
using charcoal from biomass (rather than char from coal) as a feedstock for either a
topped or non-topped Pressurized Fluid Bed Combustion (PFBC) combined cycle system to
generate steam and electricity.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a new and improved process for
biomass energy recovery based on the production and use of charcoal from biomass as a
solid fuel for a combustion turbine combined cycle power generation system.
BIOMASS CHARCOAL
Biomass Charcoal would be produced using the following
processes or improved version of same:
In Antal, U.S. Patent 5,551,958, an improved batch
process for the pyrolytic conversion of biomass (woody and herbaceous plant material) is
provided which yields charcoal, on a dry weight basis, in yields ranging from about 35% to
about 50%, having volatile matter content of about 25% or less, and fuel value of 13,000
Btu per pound.
In Schmalfeld, U.S. Patent 5,584,970 biomass,
particularly lump wood, is supplied to a shaft reactor at its top and is initially
preheated to temperatures of about 150 to 280 degrees. C. and dried by a counter-flowing
hot gas. This is followed by a treatment in an underlying carbonizing zone, the upper
portion of which is supplied with hot purging gas at a temperature of 250 to 600 degrees
C. The hot purging gas flows downward through the carbonizing zone cocurrently with the
wood.
Using charcoal, rather than biomass as a renewable
energy source, would have the following advantages:
 | The same charcoal production process can be used for a variety of
agricultural and forestry residues and dedicated energy crops. This would lead to cost
savings via standardization of processes and equipment. Also, if there are sufficient
biomass resources available, e.g. wood chips when bagasse is not available as a feedstock,
plant downtime can be reduced and charcoal can be produced year round.
|
 | The supply of biomass fuels from agricultural residues is usually
seasonal. Year round operation of a biomass gasification plant based power plant would
require storage of large quantities of biomass. Charcoal from biomass would be more
economical to handle and store than raw biomass.
|
 | Crop residues are generally low density, adding to transportation costs
and limiting the throughput capacity rating of biomass gasification plants. Charcoal with
a heating value of 13,000 Btu per pound compared to perhaps 4,800 for raw biomass, would
be more economical to transport.
|
 | Drying of biomass for a charcoal reactor is not required, where as,
biomass used in direct heated gasifiers is typically dried from 45 or 50% to approximately
20% moisture content. |
Table 1. Presents a theoretical analysis of the overall
energy effectiveness of production of high yield charcoal compared to biomass
gasification. The apparent energy effectiveness, based on the energy content of the
product gas or charcoal divided by the energy content of the input bagasse, is
approximately 70% for both cases. The values used are only estimates obtained from the
literature. However, it does appear that the parasitic losses for the direct heated, high
pressure, fluidized bed gasification process are higher than the high yield charcoal
process. Savings in transportation of charcoal vs. biomass could provide additional energy
credits for biomass charcoal.
Concerning electric power production, based on
information presented in the references, the overall thermal efficiency of firing biomass
charcoal in a solid fuel combustion system for a gas turbine should be equal or better
than that for firing of biomass gasifier product gas in a gas turbine.
Table 1. ENERGY EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS
Plant Capacity: Bagasse (Bone
Dry)
|
100
|
TPD
|
| % H2O if Feed |
20 |
% |
| Bagasse (20%) |
125 |
TPD |
| Bagasse HHV |
6600 |
Btu per lb. |
|
|
|
BIOMASS CHARCOAL PLANT (1)
|
|
|
| Charcoal Yield |
45 |
% per lb. Dry Bagasse |
| Charcoal Produced |
45 |
TPD |
| Charcoal HHV |
13,000 |
Btu per lb. |
| Energy in Bagasse |
1,650 |
MM Btu |
| Energy in Charcoal |
1,170 |
MM Btu |
| Energy Recovered in Charcoal % |
70.9 |
% |
| Energy Used to Pre-Dry Biomass
(1a) |
0.0 |
MM Btu |
| Energy Input to Charcoal Reactor |
0.06 |
Btu per Btu in Charcoal Produced |
| Energy Input to Reactor |
70 |
MM Btu |
| Net Energy Recovered |
1100 |
MM Btu |
| Overall Energy Efficiency |
67 |
% |
|
|
|
BIOMASS GASIFICATION PLANT (2)
|
|
|
| Gasifier Operating Pressure |
340.7 |
psia |
| Fuel Gas Yield |
34.3 |
SCF per lb. wet bagasse |
| Fuel Gas HV, Btu per Std Cu. Ft. |
136.6 |
Fuel Gas HV, Btu per Std Cu. Ft. |
| Energy in Bagasse |
1,650 |
MM Btu |
| Energy in Fuel Gas |
1,171 |
MM Btu |
| Energy Recovered in Fuel Gas |
71.0 |
% |
| Energy Used in Biomass Drying (2a) |
125 |
MM Btu |
| Energy Input to Gasifier (2b) |
102 |
MM Btu |
| Steam, 0.15 lb. per lb. (20%) feed
(2c) |
51 |
MM Btu |
| Net Energy Recovered |
893 |
MM Btu |
| Overall Energy Efficiency |
54 |
% |
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
| (1) Based on "Antal"
High Yield Biomass Charcoal Process |
| (1a) Dry Biomass Feed from 40% to
14% MC using Charcoal Reactor Off Gas |
| (2) Based on Air Blown IGT RENUGAS
Process: |
| (2a) Dry Biomass Feed from 40% to
20% MC using propane. |
| (2b) Air Compressors for Fluid Bed
Gasifier : 1250 BHP |
| (2c) Steam at 350 psig and 700
degrees F. |
|
|
Pressurized Fluid Bed Combustion (PFBC)
Biomass charcoal would be used as feedstock for either a
topped or non-topped Pressurized Fluid Bed Combustion (PFBC) combined cycle process to
generate electric power and steam. A first generation system will be as demonstrated using
coal at the U.S. Department of Energy, Morgantown Energy Technology Center, is described
in Figure 1. An advanced system, shown in figure 2., would include a topping combustor to
increase the turbine inlet temperature with fuel generated in a carbonizer in which
charcoal is partially combusted to produce a combustible fuel gas.
Figure 1. Biomass Charcoal Power Plant Schematic

Figure 2. Advanced Biomass Charcoal Power Plant
Schematic

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURE 1.
A biomass charcoal reactor is shown with a non-topped pressurized
fluidized bed combustion system for a gas turbine engine to generate electric power in a
combined cycle operation.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURE 2.
A biomass charcoal carbonizer and topping combustor are shown with a
pressurized fluidized bed combustion system for a gas turbine engine to generate electric
power in a combined cycle operation.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The process of the present invention will be described
hereinafter in conjunction with the biomass charcoal power plant schematic, Figure 1. .
 | Biomass is defined as organic matter available on a renewable basis.
Biomass includes forest and mill residues, agricultural crops and wastes, wood and wood
wastes, animal wastes, livestock operation residues, aquatic plants, fast-growing trees
and plants, and municipal and industrial wastes.
|
 | Charcoal Reactor: The charcoal reactor will produce charcoal using the
Antal process, U.S. Patent 5,551,958, Schmalfeld, U.S. Patent 5,584,970, or other suitable
process. The present patent does not limit the methods to be used to produce biomass
charcoal. The Antal method is a batch process for the pyrolytic conversion of biomass with
charcoal yields of about 35% to 50%, having volatile matter content of about 25% or less,
and fuel value of 13,000 Btu per pound. The fuel gas stream from the Antal charcoal
reactor will contain combustible gases, entrained tar vapors and water. The fuel gas could
be used for pre-drying the raw biomass. Schmalfeld is a continuous process using a moving
bed in a shaft reactor that incorporates preheating, carbonizing and cooling zones. The
Schmalfeld reactor fuel gas can be combusted, at least in part, outside the reactor to
produce hot purging gas.
|
 | PFBC: The PFBC will burn the charcoal in an oxygen rich atmosphere. The
temperature of the bed is controlled by using heat transfer surfaces inside the fluidized
bed to generate steam for the steam cycle. The PFBC flue gas is sent to the Hot Gas
Filters and unburned solids are collected, cooled, and stored for disposal.
|
 | The Hot Gas Filters will remove solids from the flue gas from the
Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustor. The Hot Gas Filters operate at high temperatures to
maintain the thermal efficiency of the system.
|
 | Gas Turbine Compressor: The Gas Turbine Compressor provides compressed
air to the pressurized fluidized bed combustor.
|
 | Gas Turbine Expander: The gas turbine expander accepts the
high-temperature, high-pressure gas from the pressurized fluidized bed combustor and
converts the pressure and thermal energy to electricity. The exhaust temperature is
dependent upon the specific gas turbine, but the temperature is usually greater than
800degrees F.
|
 | The Heat Recovery Steam Generator will transfer the heat remaining in the
Gas Turbine Exhaust Gas to the Steam Cycle. The temperature of the Gas Turbine Exhaust Gas
varies with the specific gas turbine, but it is usually greater than 800F for larger gas
turbines. This hot exhaust is usually cooled to about 280F before being sent to the stack.
|
 | Steam Turbine: The steam cycle uses high pressure and high temperature
steam from the PFBC and the HRSG to produce electricity. Typical steam conditions for a
PFBC System are 1800 psig and 1000 degrees F. at the throttle and a reheat to 1000 degrees
F. Other configurations are possible depending on how the Pressurized Fluidized Bed
Combustor is designed and the specific gas turbine used in the system. |
The process of the present invention will be described
hereinafter in conjunction with the biomass charcoal power plant schematic, Figure 2.
 | Charcoal is fed to a carbonizer (partial gasifier) that creates a fuel
gas and a solid char.
|
 | The char is the solid fuel to the PFBC and is burned to completion as in
Figure 1.
|
 | The fuel gas from the carbonizer and the flue gas from the PFBC are fed
to the topping combustor where the fuel gas is burned to create the desired gas turbine
inlet temperature.
|
 | The rest of the system is the same as Figure 1. |
CLAIMS
What is claimed is:
- A new and improved process for biomass energy recovery
based on the production and use of charcoal from biomass as a solid fuel for a combustion
turbine combined cycle power generation system.
- Charcoal will be produced from biomass sources using the
Antal process, U.S. Patent 5,551,958 ; Schmalfeld, U.S. Patent 5,584,970 ; or other
selected process.
- Charcoal produced from biomass will be used as feedstock
for either a topped or non-topped Pressurized Fluid Bed Combustion (PFBC) combustion
turbine combined cycle power generation system.

|